AMA Endorses Largest Denier of Health Care Claims
[ Patrick Tuohey ][The following first appeared on BigGovernment.com]
What appears to be the official blog of President Obama's administration is all aflutter because the President will welcome, "doctors from across the United States to the White House to share their unique perspective on the struggles that American families face every day when it comes to health care." (They posted today's agenda in the name of transparency!)
The post even links to a National Public Radio (NPR) story in which a survey of medical professionals indicates they are among the biggest supporters of the so-called "public option." A co-sponsor of the study, Dr. Alex Federman, indicates that, "physicians favored Medicare when it came to delivering care to patients. They thought Medicare was better when it came to autonomy and their decision making and their ability to get patients the care that they thought the patients needed."
Furthermore, the American Medical Association (AMA) has endorsed the public option after an appeal from the President and despite, according to ABC News, the fact that "some member physicians at the group's annual meeting [in June] likened the notion to communism."
Beverly Gossage, Research Fellow for Show-Me Institute and founder of HSA Benefits Consulting wondered which insurance companies rejected the most claims. She found her answer in the AMA's own 2008 National Health Insurer Report Card. The chart below appears on page 5 of the 16-page report.
Of the eight insurers listed, Medicare is most likely to reject a claim, sending away 6.85% of requests. This is more than any private insurer and double that of the private insurers' average!
In short, the AMA is endorsing a plan whose closest existing example is the most frequent denier of claims. How the public option exemplifies "delivering care to patients" is unclear.
10/5/2009 2:46:54 PM
Submit a Comment - Sign in if you have a login or create an account to start.
- Recent News
- Table of Contents
- Ethics Reform: A Return To Justice
Our legislatures must return to their primary function and our people must insist our legislatures protect the liberty of all individuals.
- Repealing the 17th Amendment
Since the founding of the nation, the states have been the consistent advocate of liberty within this nation. Their authority must be respected.
- Malfeasance as a Justification for Preemption
The federal government ought not use its inability to secure the border as a reason to keep the states from doing their part to enforce immigration laws.
- Missouri's Stake In The Energy Debate
Missouri will be affected the most by energy regulation because currently we have some of the cheapest electricity in the country.
- The Negative Consequences of Autism Insurance
Mandated autism coverage increases insurance costs for those with diseased not singled out by government.
- The Rise of the Patriot
A brief summary of human development and the rise of the American patriot.
- Ned Ryun: The Fight for the Founders
The fight for a more free America will take courage and will suffer losses, but the battle is worthwhile.
- The Coming Political Dissonance
A change is coming to Washington. From Missouri and elsewhere, a new class of politicians will be expected to dismantle the federal city and send its power back to the states.
- Ike Skelton: Do Ask, Do Tell
Why does Rep. Ike Skelton resist something that military leadership and even some conservatives have come to embrace?
- Need a Bridge?
Free-spending Republicans like Kit Bond are worse than Democrats, because they understand the principles of limited government and intentionally ignore them.
