ShowMe Better Courts has refiled a motion requesting a temporary restraining order against former Missouri Supreme Court Chief Justice Chip Robertson and his organization Missourians for Fair and Impartial Courts.
Before we get into the details, let's correct some mistakes in recent blogging. FiredUpMissouri made an error of fact that I am sure they are eager to have corrected. In a post titled, Defending Freedom with Frivolous Lawsuits, they clearly err when they write, "Harris & Co. obtained a temporary restraining order Thursday, but it was dropped Friday because they had no evidence to back up their claims." Actually, that is not at all the case. Their own link quotes Robertson as saying, "The judge decided we didn’t have enough time to tell our side of the story." It was dismissed because Robertson said he was not properly notified, not based on the merits of the claim.
In fact, in his testimony to get the restraining order quashed, Robertson had to testify that (1) yes, he spoke with ShowMe Better Court's filing attorney; (2) yes he discussed the matter of harassment with that same attorney; (3) yes he stated that the activities described were awful; and (4) yes he received a faxed copy of the motion seeking a restraining order. But no, he was unaware of the substance of the filing. Nice.
FiredUp also described the motion seeking a restraining order as frivolous. Nevermind that several people signed sworn statements that they have been harassed, battered and called racial slurs. FiredUp must think those things are frivolous because, well, because the victims are working for a political solution that FiredUp does not support. This is the political equivalent of asking a rape victim what she was wearing.
Robertson goes on to suggest that Better Courts just wanted to grab a headline and would not file again. But this is also wrong as Better Courts has refiled both a restraining order request and a lawsuit. In addition, their filings add the signature gathering firm The Lincoln Strategy Group as a party to the lawsuit because they are being denied their ability to do business. This addition is problematic for Robertson attorney Chuck Hatfield, because he is the attorney for another petition group that also retains the services of Lincoln Strategy. This puts Hatfield in a conflict of interest.
If this is the level of political and legal savvy we can expect from the Missouri Bar, it is no wonder they oppose elections.
4/20/2010 3:04:30 PM
Answering individual aggression with government aggression will not lead us to the society we desire.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch is wrong when it says that Kansas is going to fall of a fiscal cliff with its pro-growth tax reforms, and that Missouri will do the same if it follows the same path.
Randy Georges Sr. moved to the U.S. to obtain a good education; now, he may have to move across town so his kids can have the same opportunity. This is a sad state, especially when alternatives, such as giving families private school options, exist.
Missouri has at least two chances to win the Border War.
The state’s foundation formula for K-12 education is currently underfunded. Some are calling for more spending, but freedom, not money, is the answer to our problem.
Should Missouri and other states accept an offer of “free money” from Uncle Sam to expand the Medicaid program in their states? Instead of acting as enablers of fiscal profligacy, Missouri and other states should say “no.”
Conservatives ought to consider these items before ceding state power to the federal government.
Proposition B might have brought some much-needed funding for education, but voters turned down the measure. The “no” vote may actually turn out to be a blessing in disguise if legislators act on the need to address school funding issues.
Letters regarding Jacob Turk's race for Congress.
Missouri and Kansas have maintained a steady rivalry for decades, but Kansas' latest tax reforms have changed the competitive landscape between the two states — decidedly in Kansas' favor.
The state board of education voted to grant provisional accreditation to the Saint Louis Public School District, which is the correct decision, but this distinction will mean very little to schools or students.
Subsidies to Ballpark Village and other big-city sports complexes are a gift to some of our wealthiest citizens — sports team owners — that provide little or no broader economic benefit.
Strong teachers’ unions in large public school districts with multiple failing schools will do everything possible to maintain their jobs and benefits. If it is to happen, major reform must come from outside the existing system — through increased competition and choice.
Taxpayer-funded lobbying for local government entities likely will not be banned so it is time to create transparency so citizens can see how their money is being spent.
Despite a final judgment in the school transfer case, the issue remains unresolved and neither taxpayers nor students will benefit.