We took our children to Christmas in the Park, a Jackson County Parks and Recreation event featuring approximately 30 holiday themed displays and 100,000 lights (none of them too Christian, by the way). But it is one display that stirs us to comment.
A lighted display at the entrance to the park reads:
Christmas in the Park
A Gift To All
From County Executive
Jackson County Legislature
We haven't called the Parks and Rec department, but our suspicion is that this event is in fact not funded through the generosity of Sanders, et al., but by Jackson County taxpayers whose money is then appropriated by Sanders and the legislature in their official capacity. We've been given a "gift" using money taken from us.
Sadly, this mindset—that government money belongs to those who spend it—is common at all levels of government. This is why some think it is a compromise to increase taxes a little and increase spending a little, thinking the government is being prudent. In fact all money comes from the people, and good policy is reached not by a little of both but by less of one and none of the other.
We're confident that Sanders and the legislature did not require this sign be placed as a monument to their beneficence but by a grateful Parks and Rec. And we don't argue that Christmas in the Park ought not be funded. But it might be nice if the sign instead read:
Christmas in the Park
A Gift To All
From Jackson County Taxpayers.
Thank You For Your
11/28/2012 1:10:24 PM
Efforts to use public funds to revive Kansas City's jazz district have failed, and likely always will.
Answering individual aggression with government aggression will not lead us to the society we desire.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch is wrong when it says that Kansas is going to fall of a fiscal cliff with its pro-growth tax reforms, and that Missouri will do the same if it follows the same path.
Randy Georges Sr. moved to the U.S. to obtain a good education; now, he may have to move across town so his kids can have the same opportunity. This is a sad state, especially when alternatives, such as giving families private school options, exist.
Missouri has at least two chances to win the Border War.
The state’s foundation formula for K-12 education is currently underfunded. Some are calling for more spending, but freedom, not money, is the answer to our problem.
Should Missouri and other states accept an offer of “free money” from Uncle Sam to expand the Medicaid program in their states? Instead of acting as enablers of fiscal profligacy, Missouri and other states should say “no.”
Conservatives ought to consider these items before ceding state power to the federal government.
Proposition B might have brought some much-needed funding for education, but voters turned down the measure. The “no” vote may actually turn out to be a blessing in disguise if legislators act on the need to address school funding issues.
Letters regarding Jacob Turk's race for Congress.
Missouri and Kansas have maintained a steady rivalry for decades, but Kansas' latest tax reforms have changed the competitive landscape between the two states — decidedly in Kansas' favor.
The state board of education voted to grant provisional accreditation to the Saint Louis Public School District, which is the correct decision, but this distinction will mean very little to schools or students.
Subsidies to Ballpark Village and other big-city sports complexes are a gift to some of our wealthiest citizens — sports team owners — that provide little or no broader economic benefit.
Strong teachers’ unions in large public school districts with multiple failing schools will do everything possible to maintain their jobs and benefits. If it is to happen, major reform must come from outside the existing system — through increased competition and choice.
Taxpayer-funded lobbying for local government entities likely will not be banned so it is time to create transparency so citizens can see how their money is being spent.